|
|
REGULAR MEETING – The meeting of the Mendham Township Planning
Board was called to order at ROLL
CALL: Present: Mr. Tolley, Mayor Porter, Mr. D’Emidio, Mr. Buchanan, Mrs. Kinsel, Mr. Mountain, Mr. Timpson, Alt. 2 Absent: Mr. Giordano, Chairman; Mr. Majorossy, Alt. 1 Also Present: Mr. Falcon, Attorney; Mr. Kimball, Planner; Mr. Balut, Engineer Absent: Mr. Aubin, Environmentalist SALUTE TO THE FLAGADEQUATE
NOTICE OF MEETING of the Mendham Township Planning Board was given as
follows: Notice was sent to the Daily Record and the Observer Tribune
on MINUTES
– Mr. Tolley announced the hearing for SAJ, Associates was adjourned from this evening until November 18, 2002 at the request of Mr. Mulligan, Esq. in a letter dated October 16, 2002. LOVECCHIOMr. Lovecchio represented
himself in the absence of his attorney, Mr. Goldstein. He stated his application
for a minor subdivision was before the Board in order to receive completeness.
Mr. Balut explained the TRC Committee recommended waivers be granted by the Board for Checklist Items 30 (Wetlands), 35 (EIS), 36 (Map), and 51 (Slope Analysis). The application is a simple lot line adjustment, and there will not be any land disturbance involved. Neither the Board members, nor the
Consultants had comments. Mrs. Kinsel made a motion to grant completeness with
waivers, Mr. Buchanan seconded, vote all
aye. Mr. D’Emidio was not present for this vote. The hearing was scheduled
for Mr. Tolley suggested the Historic Preservation discussion be rescheduled from BRADBURY Mr. Carlin, attorney for the applicant, was
present. He indicated his purpose was to receive completeness for the minor
subdivision application on Mr. Tolley inquired if there were fire issues. Mr. Carlin said there were none. Mr. Timpson pointed out the Ralston Historic
District was included on the revised map dated Mrs. Kinsel reminded everyone the waiver was only for completeness and would receive final determination when the application was approved. Mr. Balut would be interested in seeing a Tree Preservation Committee report. Mr. Carlin mentioned that Mr. Bradbury extended an invitation to members to visit the site. Mr. Timpson made a motion to grant
completeness with the waiver, Mr. Mountain seconded, vote
all aye. A hearing date was set for NYDAM Mr. Spear, Esq. and Mr. Hansen, Ferriero Engineering, represented the applicant. Mr. Spear summarized the points of concern following the last meeting. The plans have been revised in accordance with these comments. The private road has been merged with new lot 7/01 to form a single lot; the fire tank easement has been shown on the final plat; and following professional review of the site, the driveway location would be added to the map. Mr. Balut informed the Board he had done a side-by-side comparison of both plats submitted and was satisfied as per his report suggestions. Discussion followed about the merits of concrete versus fiberglass for the fire storage tank. Mr. Spear agreed to do whichever the Board preferred. Mrs. Kinsel needed to be clear if they were deciding preliminary and final this session. Mr. Falcon emphasized it was procedurally correct to do both if preliminary conditions were satisfied. Mr. Spear requested both be decided at this time. Mr. Balut recommended there be two separate resolutions as indicated in Paragraph g) of Resolution 2-21. Mr. Falcon reviewed the Resolution, especially Paragraph e). Mr. Tolley declared that lack of enough time to review Resolution 02-21 and Mr. Betts’ letter made the decision difficult. Mr. Mercadante, attorney representing George and Marion Koste, was permitted to speak. He stated he wanted to discuss the driveway location issue. Mr. Falcon referenced Section 1. a) in the Resolution that notice would be given the Kostes as a condition of approval. Mr. Mercadante, observed the current plans if implemented would remove a natural barrier of trees. He believes there would be a better location out of the right-of-way. Mr. Falcon reiterated the time to discuss the driveway was at the September meeting before the Board closed the meeting to the public and ordered the attorney to prepare a preliminary resolution. Mr. Spear stressed the application for a private road rather than a public road in itself saved trees. He would not agree to settle further out of the parameters of the court. Mr. Falcon provided a lengthy, detailed review of Resolution 2-21. The Board members and consultants responded with suggested rewording. Discussion led to the conclusion that final approval should be in a separate resolution. Mr. D’Emidio made a motion to approve
Resolution 2-21 allowing preliminary approval with modifications, Mr. Buchanan
seconded, vote all aye. Further, Mr. D’Emidio moved to authorize
the attorney to prepare a resolution for final approval, Mrs. Kinsel seconded,
vote all aye. HEARING PERSONS PRESENT - None.
CORRESPONDENCE - Letter from
Mr. Bilinkas.
ADJOURNThere being no further business, a
motion was made to adjourn the meeting. The motion was seconded, all aye, and the meeting was adjourned at Respectfully submitted, |
|