|
MINUTES -
MENDHAM
TOWNSHIP
PLANNING BOARD
JUNE 19, 2002
The meeting of the Mendham Township Planning Board was
called to order at
7:40 p.m.
ROLL
CALL:
Present:
Mr. Giordano, Mr. Tolley, Mayor Porter, Mr. D’Emidio, Mr. Buchanan,
Mrs. Kinsel,
Mr. Mountain, Mr. Majorossy, Alt. 1; Mr. Timpson, Alt. 2
Also Present:
Mr. Falcon, Attorney; Mr. Kimball, Planner
Absent:
Mr. Aubin, Environmentalist; Mr. Balut, Engineer
Chairman Giordano called the meeting to order.
SALUTE TO THE FLAG
ADEQUATE
NOTICE OF MEETING of the Mendham Township Planning Board was given as
follows: Notice was sent to the Daily
Record and the Observer Tribune on
January 4, 2002
. Notice was posted on the bulletin
board in the Township Hall in
Brookside
,
New Jersey
on
January 4, 2002
, and Notice was filed with the Township Clerk on
January 4, 2002
.
MINUTES
–
June 3, 2002
– moved, seconded, and carried
to approve with minor changes.
BOARD OF EDUCATION
The following persons represented the Board
of Education in presenting “Mendham Township Community Committee – Ideas for
Today and Tomorrow”:
Dr. Fanning, Interim
Superintendent of Schools
Mr. Cartotto, Business Administrator
Ms. Baldwin,
Home
School
Association Member
Ms. Aldea, President of the Board of Education
Mr. San Filippo, The Prissco Group Representative
Ms. Baldwin proceeded to guide the Board through the
PowerPoint presentation. She
indicated that there had been a 5-month long planning process to address the
school system facilities issues. The following are the highlights and summary of
committee findings:
·
District enrollment statistics are anticipated to increase 25% in
the next 5 years.
·
Substantial areas of both schools reveal the need for renovations
and repairs.
·
By meeting State Educational Guidelines, the Township can qualify
for up to 40% of eligible building costs to be offset by the State from this
legislation.
·
Recommendations are to address capital improvement issues, upgrade
fire protection systems, meet ADA Compliance Codes, address growth, and update
technology.
·
Specific capital improvements to the elementary and middle schools
were outlined.
·
Education/Curriculum recommendations were identified.
·
New construction recommendations for both schools were made using
floor plan models.
·
Technology recommendations included adding LCD projection devices,
projection screens and whiteboards, installing electrical service requirements,
etc.
Mr. San Filippo reviewed the cost
structure.
·
Estimated Construction Costs:
Elementary School
$ 6,652,566
Middle School
$ 7,153,815
Soft Costs
$ 3,488,212
GRAND TOTAL
$17,294,593
·
State Reimbursement -
$ 5,317,820
Mendham
Township
Share $11,976,774
Mr. Cartotto stated the tax impact
would be $ 0.123402 per $100. On a
home valued at $500,000 the assessed increase would be $617.
Dr. Fanning suggested a Referendum be
scheduled for December 2002. If
passed, construction would begin the summer of 2003 and be completed by
September 2004.
The Board was asked for their
comments and questions.
Mr. Buchanan recommended the Board of
Education prepare a press release and have a strong public relations plan.
Dr. Fanning said presentations were
planned for various organizational meetings in the community to provide maximum
educational exposure for the public.
Mrs. Kinsel asked if updated septic
systems were being considered. Mr.
San Filippo explained there would be at the middle school.
Mr. D’Emidio suggested new
construction plans include the possibility for second floor expansion in the
future and that one general contractor oversee the work rather than obtaining
multiple sub-contractors. Mr. San
Filippo agreed.
In response to Mr. Giordano’s
question, Dr. Fanning indicated the renovations would be substantial for 10 –
15 years based on trend analysis.
Mrs. Kinsel asked if State funding is
guaranteed. Dr. Fanning stated the
State’s funding share would be calculated and incorporated into the proposed
Referendum.
Mr. Mountain suggested getting the
Township Construction Officials involved as early in the process as possible.
Mr. Giordano asked Board members if
the agenda order could be changed in order to hear the two applicants before the
Ordinance discussion. The response
was all aye.
SMITH AND DONATO
Mr. Liberman, attorney for the
applicant, and Mr. Smith were present. Mr.
Liberman opened with a review of the application.
He was in receipt of Mr. Falcon’s letter dated
June 14, 2002
. Although not necessarily in
agreement, Mr. Liberman indicated the applicant would pursue a variance if
required.
Mr. Falcon referenced his letter
recommending to the Board that the applicants amend the application to provide
for variance relief as to lot area. This
approach has the benefit of avoiding a precedent more difficult to apply in the
future. He advised Mr. Liberman it
would be necessary to notify neighbors.
Mr. Kimball, speaking for all three
consultants who attended the TRC meeting, agreed to recommend waiving
Application Checklist Numbers 28, 30, 35, 36 & 45.
Mr. Giordano called for a vote.
Mr. D’Emidio made a motion to deem the application complete with the
variance requirement and waivers. Mayor
Porter seconded the motion, vote all aye.
The applicant was scheduled for the
next Regular Planning Board Meeting on
July 17, 2002
.
SAJ
ASSOCIATES
Mr. Parker, Engineer, and an attorney
substituting for Brian Mulligan from Sterns and Weinroth, were present.
Mr. Parker stated he is seeking a
completeness determination pending a response from the DEP along with an LOI.
He asked Board members to review the findings of a report from
Environmental Technology, Inc., dated
May 7, 2002
.
Mr. Kimball supported completeness if
DEP LOI submission for approval
regarding wetlands is obtained.
Mr. D’Emidio stated it was common
practice for the Board to hear applications with DEP LOI submission for approval pending.
Mr. Parker is seeking a waiver for
Application Checklist Numbers 52 & 63 requiring a landscaping plan.
Mr. Kimball suggested granting the
waiver for completeness but making this a condition for final approval.
Everyone agreed that the water supply
and the landlocked parcel would be important issues for discussion at the
Regular Planning Board meeting on
July 17, 2002
.
Mr. D’Emidio made a motion to grant
completeness pending DEP approval, seconded by Mr. Buchanan, vote
all aye.
ORDINANCE 12-2002
Mr. Mountain provided
an explanation for the amendment relating to Equestrian Farms.
Irene’s Springtree Farm wants to install coin-operated video games for
the use of children while they wait for instruction.
Mr. Buchanan believes the activity is
not authorized or appropriate in a residential area and could set an undesirable
precedent.
Mr. D’Emidio was supportive of the
activity and for the additional income it would generate for Irene’s
Springtree Farm.
Mr. Kimball said it was consistent
with the Master Plan and favored supporting activities that allow the Farm to
survive.
Following a debate among members, a
motion was made by Mr. D’Emidio to approve Resolution PB-18 supporting the
adoption of Ordinance 12-2002. This
motion was seconded by Mr. Majorossy, aye Mr. Giordano, Mayor Porter, Mr.
Mountain; nay Mrs. Kinsel and Mr. Buchanan.
HEARING PERSONS PRESENT
None.
CORRESPONDENCE
·
Mr. Trawinski’s letter dated
June 10, 2002
, regarding Ko
Mr. Falcon advised
that it was not necessary to attach this to the minutes as suggested by Mr.
Trawinski.
ADJOURN
There being no further business, a motion was made to
adjourn the meeting. The motion was
seconded, all aye, and the meeting
was adjourned at
9:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
Lillian Smith, Secretary |